Tribunal directs AO to verify Form 26AS entries carefully to prevent unjust income additions

The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify the alleged discrepancies in Form 26AS entries. Entries for Capital First Ltd. and TVS Motors were to be reexamined, while the addition related to Worldwide Machinery Solution Pvt. Ltd. was deleted as the income was already declared. Verification was also ordered for the entry regarding Raj Motors, emphasizing the importance of thorough assessment before adding undisclosed income based on Form 26AS entries not initially disclosed. The judgment stresses the necessity of proper verification to prevent unjust additions solely relying on updated Form 26AS entries.

---

---

Issues:
1. Addition of undisclosed income based on Form 26AS entries not shown in the income tax return.

Analysis:
The appeal was against an order confirming the addition of undisclosed income of Rs. 1,29,074 due to alleged discrepancies in Form 26AS entries not declared in the income tax return for the assessment year 2015-16. The Assessing Officer noted Rs. 9,504 of undisclosed TDS related to the income and treated Rs. 1,29,074 as undisclosed income. The assessee contended that the entries were reconciled but the CIT(A) upheld the addition. The assessee argued that the discrepancies were due to TDS not part of the initial Form 26AS when the return was filed. The AR detailed discrepancies for various parties: Capital First Ltd., TVS Motors, Worldwide Machinery Solution Pvt. Ltd., and Raj Motors, explaining why certain amounts were not income. The AR emphasized that the Assessing Officer failed to verify these details properly.

The tribunal found that the Form 26AS entries were subsequently updated, indicating the discrepancies were rectified by the deductors. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to verify the correctness and nature of the alleged receipts, especially for Capital First Ltd. and TVS Motors. Regarding Worldwide Machinery Solution Pvt. Ltd., as the interest income was already declared, the addition of Rs. 60,000 was deleted. For Raj Motors, where the assessee only purchased spare parts, the tribunal directed verification of the entry and the nature of the transaction. The tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for proper verification before making additions based on Form 26AS entries not reflected in the return.

The judgment highlights the importance of thorough verification before treating discrepancies in Form 26AS as undisclosed income. It underscores the need for assessing officers to investigate the nature of transactions and verify entries with the other party involved. The tribunal's decision focused on ensuring accurate assessment and avoiding unjust additions based solely on updated Form 26AS entries not initially disclosed.

---