TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal remands case for fresh assessment on unexplained cash deposits and liabilities</h1> <h3>ITO, Ward-13 (1), Kolkata Versus M/s Dhenu Holding & Suppliers Pvt. Ltd And (Vice-Versa)</h3> ITO, Ward-13 (1), Kolkata Versus M/s Dhenu Holding & Suppliers Pvt. Ltd And (Vice-Versa) - TMI Issues:1. Justification of deletion of addition made towards unexplained cash deposit in the bank account of the assessee company.2. Action of upholding the addition made towards unexplained liabilities in the form of share application money and sundry creditors for all three assessment years.Analysis:Issue 1:The appeals by the Revenue and the Cross Objections by the assessee questioned the deletion of the addition towards unexplained cash deposit in the bank account of the assessee company. The ld. CIT(A) directed the ld. AO to add only a commission on the total transactions. The assessee, a private limited company, failed to provide evidence of filing the return of income originally. The ld. AO proceeded to treat the entire cash deposits in the bank account as unexplained. However, the ld. CIT(A) considered the company as an accommodation entry provider and directed to tax only the commission attributable to the deposits. The Tribunal found no effective representation by the assessee and remanded the case to the ld. AO for fresh adjudication, allowing the assessee to present true facts and fresh evidence.Issue 2:The second common issue was the action of upholding the addition made towards unexplained liabilities, including share application money and sundry creditors for all three assessment years. The ld. CIT(A) upheld the addition due to lack of cooperation and evidence from the assessee. The Tribunal decided to remand this issue to the ld. AO for fresh adjudication, giving the assessee the opportunity to provide new evidence. The grounds raised by the assessee in the cross objection were allowed for statistical purposes.In conclusion, the appeals of the revenue and the cross objections of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes, and the Tribunal ordered a fresh adjudication by the ld. AO for both issues.
TaxTMI 