Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the land sold by the assessee was agricultural land on the date of sale and therefore outside the capital gains provisions.
Analysis: The land had been purchased long before, was continuously used for agricultural purposes, and the revenue records supported that user. Permission under section 63 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, was obtained only because the proposed purchaser was a non-agriculturist, and conversion to non-agricultural use occurred only after the sale. The mere fact that the land fetched a high price or had potential for non-agricultural use did not displace its agricultural character. The presumption arising from actual cultivation and the entries in the record of rights was not rebutted by any contrary material.
Conclusion: The land remained agricultural land on the date of sale, and the Tribunal was wrong in holding otherwise; the reference was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Actual agricultural user, supported by revenue entries, raises a presumption that land is agricultural land, and mere potential non-agricultural value or intended post-sale conversion does not by itself change its character at the date of sale.