Tribunal allows appeal, directs deletion of disallowed remuneration.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of Rs. 45,00,000 made on account of remuneration paid to partners of the firm. The Tribunal found that the partnership deed complied with the requirements of Section 40(b)(v) and the CBDT Circular, distinguishing the case from previous decisions. Emphasizing the principle of consistency, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the lower authorities' findings and allowing all grounds of appeal. The decision was pronounced in the Open Court on 12th February 2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of Rs. 45,00,000 on account of remuneration paid to partners of the firm.

Detailed Analysis:

Issue 1: Disallowance of Rs. 45,00,000 on account of remuneration paid to partners of the firm

Background:
The assessee, a law firm (partnership), derived income under the head "profit and gains of business & profession" and "income from other sources". The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed Rs. 45,00,000 paid as remuneration to two partners (Rs. 30,00,000 to one and Rs. 15,00,000 to another) on the grounds that it was not paid in accordance with Section 40(b)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO's decision was based on the partnership deed, which stated that remuneration would be shared among partners in their profit-sharing ratio but did not specify the amount or manner of quantifying the remuneration. The AO relied on CBDT Circular No. 739 dated 25/03/1996 and the Delhi High Court decision in Sood Brij & Associate Vs. CIT.

Assessee's Argument:
The assessee argued that the remuneration was paid in accordance with Section 40(b)(v) and pointed to the relevant clauses of the partnership deed specifying the manner of quantifying remuneration. They also cited the Delhi High Court decision in CIT vs. Vaish Associates, where similar issues were resolved in favor of the assessee. The assessee emphasized the principle of consistency, noting that a similar disallowance was deleted by the CIT(A) in the assessment year 2009-10, and the Department did not appeal that decision.

Tribunal's Findings:
1. Partnership Deed Compliance: The Tribunal noted that the partnership deed specified that the remuneration allowable under Section 40(b)(v) would be shared among partners in their profit-sharing ratio (2/3 and 1/3). This clause was found to satisfy the requirements of the CBDT Circular, contrary to the AO's findings.

2. CBDT Circular No. 739: The Tribunal clarified that the circular requires either the quantification of the remuneration amount or the manner of quantification to be specified in the partnership deed. The Tribunal found that the partnership deed met these requirements as it provided for remuneration to be shared in the specified profit-sharing ratio.

3. Case Law Analysis: The Tribunal distinguished the present case from Sood Brij & Associates, where remuneration was left to future mutual agreements, which was not the case here. The Tribunal found the decision in Vaish Associates applicable, where the methodology and manner of computing partner remuneration were deemed compliant with Section 40(b)(v).

4. Principle of Consistency: The Tribunal emphasized the principle of consistency, noting that the CIT(A) had deleted a similar disallowance in the previous assessment year (2009-10), and the Department did not appeal that decision.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal set aside the findings of the lower authorities and directed the AO to delete the disallowance of Rs. 45,00,000. All grounds of appeal by the assessee were allowed, and the appeal was decided in favor of the assessee.

Result:
The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the decision was pronounced in the Open Court on 12th February 2019.

---