TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT upholds deletion of income addition for assessment year 2012-13</h1> <h3>ITO, WARD 20 (3), NEW DELHI Versus M/s RMS ENERGY PVT. LTD.</h3> ITO, WARD 20 (3), NEW DELHI Versus M/s RMS ENERGY PVT. LTD. - TMI Issues:1. Addition of income without proving nature of invoice2. Appeal against CIT(A) orderAnalysis:1. The case involved an appeal by the Revenue against the CIT(A)'s order deleting an addition of Rs. 2,89,17,000 to the assessee's income for the assessment year 2012-13. The AO added this amount as the assessee allegedly did not disclose receipts from M/s Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. The CIT(A) found that the revenue pertained to two financial years based on a Joint Promotional Activity Agreement and ledger account evidence. The AO's basis for taxing the amount in the current year was the TDS deduction by M/s Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. The CIT(A) referred to Section 199 of the Income Tax Act and Rule 37(BA)(3) of the IT Rules, allowing credit for TDS across years proportionately to income assessable. The CIT(A) ruled in favor of the assessee, stating that the addition lacked merit as the receipts were offered in two financial years with proportionate TDS credits, and payments were received in different years. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.2. The Revenue contended that the CIT(A) erred in law by deleting the addition without considering the nature of the invoice raised by the assessee. The ITAT found that the AO's addition was primarily based on the TDS deduction by M/s Sistema Shyam Teleservices Ltd. and that the assessee had correctly offered the receipts in two financial years with proportionate TDS credits. The ITAT agreed with the CIT(A)'s reasoning that the addition lacked a basis, as payments were received in different financial years, and expenditure was booked accordingly. Therefore, the ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.This detailed analysis of the judgment provides insights into the issues raised, the arguments presented by both parties, and the reasoning behind the final decision rendered by the ITAT.
TaxTMI 