Works contract and maintenance classification turn on non-commercial use and dominant activity in government water-supply projects

Government water-supply turnkey construction for a public health department was outside works contract service because it was non-commercial governmental work. Operation and maintenance of an electro chlorinator plant was also outside management, maintenance and repair service because operation was the dominant function and maintenance was merely incidental; it likewise did not fall under business auxiliary service since it was not connected with business or commerce. The tax demand and penalties were therefore unsustainable, with consequential relief to the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether construction of drinking water bore well and tank on turnkey basis for a government department was taxable as works contract service. (ii) Whether operation and maintenance of an electro chlorinator plant was classifiable as management, maintenance and repair service.

Issue (i): Whether construction of drinking water bore well and tank on turnkey basis for a government department was taxable as works contract service.

Analysis: The activity was undertaken for a public health department for supply of drinking water and was not in the nature of commerce or industry. The statutory description of works contract service under the Finance Act did not bring such non-commercial governmental work within the taxable net as applied in the relevant precedent relied upon.

Conclusion: The activity was not taxable as works contract service and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether operation and maintenance of an electro chlorinator plant was classifiable as management, maintenance and repair service.

Analysis: The dominant activity was operation of the chlorination plant. Maintenance was merely incidental and linked to the main operational function. On that basis, the activity did not answer the statutory definition of management, maintenance and repair service, and it also did not fall under business auxiliary service because it was not connected with business or commerce.

Conclusion: The activity was not classifiable under management, maintenance and repair service and the finding was in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The tax demand and penalties were unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to consequential relief.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the dominant activity is a non-commercial governmental service and the maintenance element is merely incidental to the principal operation, the composite activity does not become taxable under the proposed service category.

---