By-products from dutiable manufacture are not final products, so no Cenvat payment arose on soap stock and acid oil.

Soap stock and acid oil arising incidentally in the manufacture of refined edible oil were treated as by-products, not final products. The dutiable refined edible oil was the intended manufactured product, so the Cenvat provision requiring payment of an amount linked to exempted final products did not apply. Authorities dealing with exempt intermediate and final products, or with goods that were themselves the intended product, were held inapplicable on these facts. The result was that no 8% payment was payable on the value of soap stock and acid oil.

---

---

Issues: Whether soap stock and acid oil arising in the manufacture of refined edible oil were by-products or final products, and whether the assessee was required to pay an amount equal to 8% of their value under the relevant Cenvat credit provisions.

Analysis: The refined edible oil manufactured by the assessee was the dutiable final product, while soap stock and acid oil arose only incidentally in the course of manufacture. The relevant provision for payment of 8% on exempted final products was not attracted where the assessee was not engaged in the manufacture of the by-products as such. The cited authorities relating to situations where both the intermediate and final products were exempted, or where the disputed goods were not the intended manufactured product, did not govern the present facts. The reasoning that waste or incidental by-products arising during manufacture do not become the final product was applied.

Conclusion: Soap stock and acid oil were by-products, not final products, and the assessee was not liable to pay 8% of their value.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee manufactures a dutiable final product and the disputed goods arise only incidentally as by-products, the obligation to reverse credit or pay an amount linked to exempted final products does not arise.

---