Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the excess realised by the assessee on sale of goods received on dissolution of the partnership was income, profits or gains from business or capital gains.
Analysis: The goods distributed on dissolution were admittedly the stock-in-trade of the partnership. The character of those commodities did not change merely because they were allotted to the partners in specie instead of being sold by the firm and the proceeds divided. The decisive test was whether the assessee was merely realising an investment or was engaged in a trading operation for profit. As the goods were perishable grocery articles ordinarily held for resale, and the assessee disposed of them by repeated sales in the ordinary course of the same trading activity, the surplus arose from a trading operation and not from the realisation of a capital asset. The authorities relied on for the assessee were distinguishable on their facts because they concerned assets such as land or real properties, where the question of investment or capital realisation stood on a different footing.
Conclusion: The excess realised on sale of the goods constituted income, profits or gains from business and did not amount to capital gains, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where stock-in-trade of a business is distributed among partners on dissolution and is thereafter sold in the ordinary course as trading stock, the profit realised remains business income unless the assessee shows that the asset was converted into capital and held merely for realisation of investment.