Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest earned on deposits and investments made by the District Magistrate, appointed by court to take over the assets of the company, was assessable as the income of the company.
Analysis: The assets had been taken over under court orders, and the District Magistrate was acting in the character of a receiver or manager of property. Under section 41 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and the corresponding provisions in sections 160(1)(iii), 161 and 166 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, income received by a person managing property on behalf of another could be assessed in the hands of the representative assessee, with power to make direct assessment on the person beneficially entitled. The deposits and the interest accrued remained part of the assets held for the company until distribution to depositors, and the company could not be treated as divested of ownership merely because the funds were intended to be applied for depositors.
Conclusion: The interest income was correctly taxed as the income of the company in the hands of the District Magistrate as representative assessee, and the question was answered in favour of the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Income arising from property held under court orders by a receiver or manager is assessable in the hands of the representative assessee under the representative-assessment provisions, and remains attributable to the person on whose behalf it is received until legally distributed.