TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tax Appeal: Assessing Officer to Reconsider Exemption Denial, Notional Rental Income Issue</h1> <h3>Ms. Bina Sudhirkumar Doshi Versus Asst. CIT-24 (1), Mumbai</h3> Ms. Bina Sudhirkumar Doshi Versus Asst. CIT-24 (1), Mumbai - TMI Issues:1. Denial of exemption under section 54/54F of the Income Tax Act, 19612. Taxing notional rental incomeAnalysis:Issue 1: Denial of exemption under section 54/54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961The appellant contested the denial of exemption under section 54/54F of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Appellant argued that all conditions mentioned in section 54 were satisfied, entitling them to exemption. Additionally, it was claimed that exemption under section 54F was also applicable. The denial of indexation benefit by the Assessing Officer (AO) was highlighted. The Appellate Tribunal noted a delay in filing the appeal, which was condoned due to the appellant's health issues. The appellant withdrew certain grounds of appeal. The appellant also filed a petition for admission of additional evidence, including a purchase agreement and photographs supporting the claim for exemption under section 54F. The Tribunal directed the AO to consider the claim under section 54F, emphasizing the importance of granting the appellant a fair opportunity to be heard.Issue 2: Taxing notional rental incomeThe appellant challenged the taxing of notional rental income on properties under construction. It was argued that the properties were not in possession, hence no rental income could be charged. The appellant further contended that even if some rental income could be charged, the amount was excessive. The Tribunal remitted this issue, along with the additional evidence submitted, to the AO for fresh consideration. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a thorough review by the AO in light of the additional evidence presented by the appellant.In conclusion, the appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with certain grounds remitted to the AO for reconsideration. The Tribunal stressed the importance of providing the appellant with a fair opportunity to present their case and directed the AO to reevaluate the issues in light of the additional evidence submitted.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
