Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>High Court allows business expenses for accommodating foreign visitors under Income-tax Act</h1> <h3>Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, AP Versus Maddi Venkataratnam And Co. Private Limited</h3> Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, AP Versus Maddi Venkataratnam And Co. Private Limited - [1979] 119 ITR 514, 1977 CTR 18 Issues involved: Interpretation of entertainment expenses u/s 37(2) and u/s 37(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Summary:The case involved the question of whether a sum of Rs. 38,229 spent by the assessee on guests could be allowed under section 37(2) or section 37(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee, a private limited company, had claimed entertainment and guest expenses for the assessment year 1967-68. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed a portion of the claimed expenses, treating them as entertainment expenditure. The assessee contended that the guest expenses were for lodging and boarding foreign customers and representatives for business purposes. The Appellate Authority Commissioner (AAC) held that the disallowed amount was necessary for the business and not entertainment expenditure. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, considering the expenses as necessary for business purposes. The High Court analyzed previous judgments and held that the expenses on foreign visitors were business expenditure falling under section 37(1) and not entertainment expenditure under section 37(2).In analyzing the concept of entertainment expenditure, the High Court referred to previous judgments from the Bombay High Court and the Gujarat High Court. The court emphasized that expenses for food, drinks, or amusement provided to clients or customers should be considered entertainment only if lavish or wasteful. In the present case, the expenses incurred by the assessee for accommodating foreign visitors for business purposes were deemed necessary and not entertainment expenditure. The court agreed with the reasoning of the Gujarat High Court and held that the amount spent on guests was a legitimate business expenditure falling under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court also highlighted the need for coherence between government departments to encourage exports and industrial development.Therefore, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the amount of Rs. 38,229 spent on guests under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and directed the revenue to pay the costs of the assessee.