Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether depreciation on the assets acquired on demerger was to be disallowed under Explanation 7 to Section 43(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether deduction under Section 80IC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be allowed on the basis of Form 10CCB.
Analysis: The claim for depreciation turned on the effect of the demerger, the treatment of the assets in the preceding years, and whether the depreciation had thereafter to be worked on written down value. As the record did not show what had happened in the earlier assessment years after the demerger, the matter required verification by the Assessing Officer. The direction to allow deduction under Section 80IC was upheld, with the audit report in Form 10CCB treated as having been filed and examined.
Conclusion: The depreciation issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination in the light of the earlier years and the relevant precedents. The direction to allow deduction under Section 80IC as per law was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The matter was not finally determined on the depreciation claim and was sent back for factual verification, while the direction concerning Section 80IC was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the allowability of depreciation on demerged assets depends on the treatment adopted in earlier assessment years, the issue must first be examined with reference to the prior years and the applicable written down value mechanism before a final decision is made.