Freight and coolie charges treated as post-sale expenses were excluded from taxable turnover under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act.

Freight and coolie charges separately accounted for as indirect, post-sale expenses did not form part of the taxable turnover under the Tamil Nadu VAT Act. The assessee's sale bills and accounts showed that the cement price was fixed by the manufacturer or wholesale agent, and the charges were not included in the sale price. The Assessing Officer relied mainly on the Enforcement Wing report without independent verification of the supporting records, and the Tribunal had no factual basis to disturb the first appellate authority's finding. Accordingly, the charges could not be subjected to tax.

---

---

Issues: Whether freight and coolie charges incurred by a cement dealer and shown as indirect expenses formed part of the taxable turnover under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006.

Analysis: The assessee was a retailer in cement, a controlled commodity, and the price was fixed by the manufacturer or wholesale agent. The materials showed that freight and handling charges were accounted for separately as indirect expenses in the profit and loss account and were treated in commercial terms as post-sale expenses. The Tribunal had accepted that the sale bills and accounting system established that such charges did not form part of the sale price, but still brought them to tax on the footing that they were not reimbursed. The Court held that the Assessing Officer had acted largely on the Enforcement Wing report without making an independent verification of the assessee's explanation and supporting records, and that the Tribunal had no basis to disturb the factual finding of the first appellate authority.

Conclusion: Freight and coolie charges did not form part of the taxable turnover and could not be subjected to tax.

---