Writ challenge to reopening notice declined where a related tax issue was already pending, with interim protection preserved.

The Supreme Court treated the writ challenge to a reopening notice under Section 148 as inappropriate where the connected issue on the applicability of Section 115BBC was already pending before the appellate authority for another assessment year. Because any finding on whether income had escaped assessment could affect that pending dispute, the High Court was justified in declining writ interference and leaving the assessee to pursue remedies in accordance with law. At the same time, the Court protected the assessee from recovery consequences by extending interim protection on completion of the reassessment and preserved liberty to challenge the reopening notice in appropriate proceedings.

---

---

Issues: Whether the High Court ought to have exercised writ jurisdiction to examine the validity of a notice for reopening assessment under Section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 when the connected issue was already pending before the appellate authority, and what consequential protection should be granted to the assessee.

Analysis: The applicability of Section 115BBC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was already the central issue pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for a different assessment year. Any adjudication on whether there was reason to believe that income had escaped assessment would have had a direct bearing on that pending appellate dispute. In these circumstances, the High Court was justified in declining to enter upon the writ challenge and in leaving the assessee to work out its remedies in accordance with law. At the same time, the Court considered it appropriate to protect the assessee against recovery consequences by extending interim protection upon completion of the reassessment.

Conclusion: The refusal to decide the writ challenge was upheld, but the assessment was directed to proceed, the challenge to the reopening notice was kept open for appropriate proceedings, interim protection was ordered, and the assessee was given liberty to pursue remedies.

---