Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the expenditure incurred on renovation, replacement of fittings and repairs to the cinema hall was deductible as revenue expenditure or was capital expenditure.
Analysis: The expenditure had to be judged in its totality and not by isolating individual items such as repainting, flooring, roofing, doors, windows and wiring. The building was extensively renovated after closure for several months, new machinery, furniture, sanitary fittings and electrical fittings were installed, and large quantities of bricks and cement were used. The work resulted in a substantial transformation of the premises from an old structure into a well-equipped cinema theatre. On the settled distinction between repairs, which preserve and maintain an existing asset, and expenditure that brings into existence a new or substantially improved asset or an enduring advantage, the character of the outlay was capital and not merely revenue.
Conclusion: The expenditure was not deductible as revenue expenditure and was capital in nature, in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure that substantially renovates or transforms an existing asset so as to confer an enduring advantage or bring about a materially improved asset is capital expenditure, even if some of its components may individually resemble repairs.