Tribunal Confirms Customs Classification, Reduces Redemption Fine and Penalty

The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under heading 27101290, leading to confiscation under the Customs Act. The redemption fine was reduced from Rs. 82,00,000 to Rs. 40,00,000, and the penalty decreased from Rs. 54,00,000 to Rs. 25,00,000 based on a previous decision. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the Revenue with modifications to the penalty amounts.

---

---

Issues involved: Classification of imported goods under different headings, violation of Import Export Policy, confiscation of goods, redemption fine, penalty under Customs Act.

Classification of Goods:
The appeal concerns the classification of imported goods, specifically "Low Aromatic White Spirit (ANYSON-5) in bulk (Laws)." The appellants claim classification under heading 27101990, while the Revenue argues for classification under 27101290. Although the duty rates are the same under both headings, the Importer-Exporter Code (IEC) requirements differ significantly. Goods classified under 27101990 are freely importable, while under 27101290, they are restricted and reserved for import through specified public sector undertakings (PSUs).

Violation of Import Export Policy:
The Adjudicating Commissioner classified the goods under 27101290, stating that they were imported in violation of the Export Import Policy as restricted goods. Consequently, the goods were held liable for confiscation under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act, 1962, and were confiscated under Section 125. The Commissioner allowed the appellants to redeem the goods upon payment of a redemption fine of Rs. 82,00,000.

Penalties Imposed:
For various contraventions leading to the confiscation of goods, the Commissioner held the appellants liable for a penalty under Section 112(a)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962, imposing a penalty of Rs. 54,00,000. The appellants argued that a previous decision by the Ahmedabad Bench of the Tribunal favored them, reducing the redemption fine and penalty amounts significantly. However, the Authorized Representative for the Revenue contended that the issue was identical and should be decided in favor of the Revenue.

Judgment:
The Tribunal considered the submissions of both parties and noted that the Ahmedabad Bench had previously decided against the appellant, classifying the goods under CTH 27101290. The Tribunal upheld this classification and the confiscation of goods under Section 111(d). Following the Ahmedabad Bench's order, the Tribunal reduced the redemption fine from Rs. 82,00,000 to Rs. 40,00,000 and the penalty from Rs. 54,00,000 to Rs. 25,00,000. The Tribunal upheld the order of the adjudicating authority with the modifications mentioned, disposing of the appeal accordingly.

---