Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal has inherent power to recall an ex parte order passed in violation of natural justice and to restore the appeal for rehearing.
Analysis: The power of rectification is distinct from substantive review, and procedural review includes the power to recall an order. Such power is inherent in every quasi-judicial authority, and Rule 25 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 specifically contemplates setting aside an ex parte order and restoring the appeal where sufficient cause for non-appearance is shown. Rejection of a recall application merely on the ground that no power of review exists is therefore unsustainable where violation of natural justice is asserted.
Conclusion: The Tribunal does have inherent and statutory power to recall an ex parte order and to restore the matter; the contrary view was set aside, and the matter was remanded for reconsideration of the recall applications.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the legal question of recall jurisdiction, and the Tribunal was directed to reconsider the applications afresh in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: A quasi-judicial tribunal has inherent power of procedural review to recall an order passed ex parte or in violation of natural justice, and this power is reinforced where the relevant rules expressly permit setting aside such an order and restoring the matter.