Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 was barred by limitation.
Analysis: Section 238A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 makes the Limitation Act, 1963 applicable to proceedings under the Code. For an application under Section 9, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies, prescribing three years from the date when the right to apply accrues. On the facts, the right to apply accrued when the Code came into force and the claim was also traced to a continuing commercial relationship, so the application could not be treated as time barred. The question whether the underlying claim was time barred was held to be a matter for the Interim Resolution Professional or Resolution Professional, subject to correction by the Adjudicating Authority if required.
Conclusion: The limitation objection failed and the Section 9 application was held to be within time.