Appeal allowed for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) - Tribunal directs remand for verification The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing a remand to the AO for verification regarding the disallowance of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal allowed for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) - Tribunal directs remand for verification
The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee for statistical purposes, directing a remand to the AO for verification regarding the disallowance of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal highlighted that if no deduction was claimed in the computation of income, the disallowance by the AO would be unwarranted to prevent double disallowance. The decision was pronounced on 11th January, 2019 at Ahmedabad.
Issues: 1. Appeal against order of ld.CIT(A)-5, Ahmedabad dated 30.5.2017 for the Asstt.Year 2013-14. 2. Eligibility for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. Disallowance of deduction by the ld.AO. 4. Verification of computation of income by the AO.
Analysis: The appellant appealed to the Tribunal against the order of ld.CIT(A)-5, Ahmedabad for the Asstt.Year 2013-14. The grounds of appeal were found to be descriptive and argumentative, not in line with Rule 8 of the Income Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963. The grievance of the assessee was regarding the disallowance of deduction amounting to Rs. 7,70,959 under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Upon careful review of the records, it was noted that the assessee, formerly a cooperative bank, had its license canceled by the Reserve Bank of India and was being assessed as a credit society. The ld.AO disallowed the deduction claimed under section 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned on deposits with Gujarat State Cooperative Bank, resulting in an addition to the income. The appeal to the ld.CIT(A) did not provide relief to the assessee.
During the proceedings, the ld.counsel for the assessee clarified that no deduction was claimed in the computation of income, challenging the disallowance made by the AO. The Tribunal observed that the assessee had not provided a copy of the computation of income, leading to a lack of clarity on the claimed deductions. Consequently, the issue was remanded to the AO for verification. It was directed that if no deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was claimed in the computation of income, the disallowance made by the AO would be unwarranted to avoid double disallowance.
The Tribunal emphasized that its decision would not prejudice the case of the AO or the defense of the assessee during the proceedings before the AO. Ultimately, the appeal of the assessee was allowed for statistical purposes, with the order pronounced on 11th January, 2019 at Ahmedabad.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.