Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment under section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was valid on the ground that tax credit earlier allowed for tax deducted at source should not have been granted.
Analysis: The reopening rested on information that the deductor had not remitted the tax deducted from dividends to the Central Government. The Court held that section 147(b) read with Explanation 1 applies only where income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment, including cases of under-assessment, assessment at too low a rate, excessive relief, or excessive loss/depreciation. On the facts, the assessed income and rate of tax remained unchanged; only the credit for tax deducted at source was withdrawn. Following the principle that excess credit is not the same as excessive relief in computing taxable income, the Court held that the case did not fall within Explanation 1(c).
Conclusion: Reassessment under section 147(b) was not attracted and was invalid.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the Revenue and the assessee retained the benefit of the original assessment insofar as the reopening was concerned.
Ratio Decidendi: Excess tax credit allowed at the stage of assessment does not, by itself, amount to income being made the subject of excessive relief so as to justify reassessment under section 147(b).