Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether profits arising from transactions of Lal Mills with certain parties were assessable in the hands of the individual karta or in the hands of the Hindu undivided family.
Analysis: The shares of the companies and the finances supporting the business were found to belong to the Hindu undivided family, and the karta was acting in that capacity when dealing with the transactions. The income was earned by reason of the control and opportunities which the family's investment and position in the companies afforded. On those facts, a sufficient nexus existed between the family and the profits brought to tax.
Conclusion: The profits were assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family and not in the hands of the individual karta.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered against the assessee, and the tax liability on the disputed profits attached to the family.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a karta earns profits by virtue of opportunities and control arising from the assets and financing of the Hindu undivided family, the resulting income is taxable as the family's income.