Appeal partly allowed, undisclosed payments set aside for review, interest charges dismissed

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside the additions of undisclosed payments towards credit cards, short term capital gain, and alleged payments to Multiplex Capital Limited for fresh examination. The issue of charging interest under sections 234A and 234B was dismissed. The order was pronounced on 07/01/2019.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Addition of Rs. 33,92,703/- as undisclosed payments towards credit cards.
2. Addition of Rs. 3,18,925/- under the head ‘short term capital gain’.
3. Addition of Rs. 2,58,472/- for alleged payments to Multiplex Capital Limited.
4. Charging of interest of Rs. 5,28,695/- under sections 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Addition of Rs. 33,92,703/- as Undisclosed Payments towards Credit Cards:
The assessee was found to have made payments towards various credit cards, and was asked to furnish the source thereof. The Assessing Officer (AO) rejected the explanation provided by the assessee, which claimed that these were bank transfers from one credit card to another, and made an addition of Rs. 33,92,703/-. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] confirmed this addition, noting that the assessee had not provided complete details and was concealing information. The CIT(A) observed that the assessee had numerous credit cards and bank accounts, with substantial unaccounted transactions, including cash deposits of Rs. 8,18,500/- and an unexplained credit entry of Rs. 5,00,000/-. The Tribunal, however, noted that the lower authorities had not verified the entire transaction cycle and set aside the matter to the AO for fresh examination, directing the assessee to substantiate the inter-credit card transactions and cash deposits.

2. Addition of Rs. 3,18,925/- under the Head ‘Short Term Capital Gain’:
The AO made an addition of Rs. 3,18,925/- based on information received from Multiplex Capital Ltd under section 133(6) of the Act. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition. The assessee contended that the AO had only considered the transactions of sale and purchase of shares, ignoring the opening and closing balances of securities, and claimed to have incurred a loss of Rs. 1,46,160/- during the year. The Tribunal found that the assessee had submitted detailed records of share transactions, including losses from trading and profits from jobbing activities. The Tribunal set aside the issue to the AO for fresh examination, directing the assessee to demonstrate the actual profit or loss incurred.

3. Addition of Rs. 2,58,472/- for Alleged Payments to Multiplex Capital Limited:
The AO made an addition of Rs. 2,58,472/- on the premise that the assessee had made payments to Multiplex Capital Limited, which the assessee failed to explain. The CIT(A) confirmed this addition. The assessee argued that these were not payments made by him to the broker, but rather payments made by the broker to him. The Tribunal noted the discrepancy and set aside the issue to the AO for fresh verification, directing the assessee to prove the actual nature of the transactions.

4. Charging of Interest of Rs. 5,28,695/- under Sections 234A and 234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961:
The assessee contested the charging of interest under sections 234A and 234B, which was consequential in nature. The Tribunal dismissed this ground, as it was dependent on the outcome of the other issues.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, setting aside the issues related to the additions of Rs. 33,92,703/-, Rs. 3,18,925/-, and Rs. 2,58,472/- to the AO for fresh examination and verification. The issue of charging interest under sections 234A and 234B was dismissed as consequential. The order was pronounced in the open court on 07/01/2019.

---