Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of share capital and share premium received by the assessee was justified.
Analysis: The assessee produced the details of the share applicants, including confirmations, PAN, income-tax acknowledgements, balance sheets, bank statements, allotment records and other supporting material. The Assessing Officer's remand report, after verification, recorded that the identity, creditworthiness and genuineness of the investors were found in order and that the impugned capital receipt including premium was legally in order. In these circumstances, the foundational requirements for an addition under section 68 were not established, and the assessee could not be asked to prove the source of source once the primary burden was discharged.
Conclusion: The addition under section 68 was not sustainable and was rightly deleted.