TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court allows GST Council impleadment, permits petition amendment, sets filing deadlines.</h1> <h3>M/s. Future Gaming and Hotel Services Private Limited and Another Versus Union of India and Others</h3> The court allowed the impleadment of the Goods and Services Tax Council and other officials as party respondents, granted permission for amending the writ ... The Chief Commissioner and the Senior Joint Commissioner, Large Tax Payer Unit, GST, Government of West Bengal, shall be impleaded as party Respondents in the present proceeding - Application is allowed. Issues involved:1. Condonation of delay in filing a rejoinder.2. Impleadment of Goods and Services Tax Council and other officials.3. Constitutional validity of SGST Act exemption on lotteries.Condonation of delay in filing a rejoinder:The court heard an application seeking condonation of delay in filing a rejoinder to the counter-affidavit. The delay was condoned, and the application was disposed of accordingly.Impleadment of Goods and Services Tax Council and other officials:An application was filed for impleadment of the Goods and Services Tax Council, Chief Commissioner of Goods and Service Tax, and Senior Joint Commissioner, Large Tax Payer Unit, GST. The application highlighted that the GST Council is a statutory body with specific duties under the Constitution. Allegations were made against the officials regarding coercive actions against the petitioners. The court allowed the impleadment application, noting no objections from the parties.Constitutional validity of SGST Act exemption on lotteries:The petition sought a declaration that the exemption of lotteries from taxation under the SGST Act is unconstitutional. The respondents did not object to the impleadment application. The court allowed the impleadment of the GST Council, Chief Commissioner, and Senior Joint Commissioner as party respondents. The petitioners were granted permission to amend the writ petition, with timelines set for filing amended documents and responses.In summary, the court addressed issues related to delay in filing a rejoinder, impleadment of relevant officials, and the constitutional validity of an SGST Act exemption on lotteries. The court allowed the impleadment of the Goods and Services Tax Council and other officials as party respondents, granted permission for amending the writ petition, and set timelines for filing amended documents and responses.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
