Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the firm was entitled to registration under the Income-tax Act, 1961, when the liquor business was carried on in breach of the Punjab Excise Act, 1914, the Punjab Liquor Licence Rules, 1956, and the licence conditions.
Analysis: The liquor licence and the governing excise rules permitted possession and sale of intoxicants only in accordance with the licence and its conditions. The rules also restricted the introduction of new partners and the conduct of sales by persons whose names had not been approved and endorsed on the licence. The firm admittedly included persons whose names were not so endorsed. Even if the partnership was valid under general partnership law, the business was carried on in violation of the excise statute, the rules, and the licence terms. A firm engaged in such unlawful trading activity was not entitled to registration for income-tax purposes.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative. The firm was not entitled to registration, and the finding was against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A partnership firm carrying on business in contravention of statutory excise prohibitions and incorporated licence conditions cannot claim registration under the Income-tax Act, 1961.