High Court: DTAA prevails over Section 206AA for tax rates in Income Tax Act

The High Court held that Section 206AA of the Income Tax Act does not override Section 90(2) of the Act. The Court affirmed that the assessee, a Limited Company, was not obligated to deduct tax at a higher rate of 20% but could apply the lower rate specified in the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) due to the provisions of Section 90(2). The Court's decision aligned with the interpretation in a previous Delhi High Court case, emphasizing the significance of DTAAs in determining tax rates for non-residents. The Income Tax Appeals were dismissed in favor of the assessee.

---

---

Issues:
Interpretation of Section 206AA and Section 90(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Analysis:
The High Court was presented with the issue of whether Section 206AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 overrides the provision of Section 90(2) of the Act. The case involved an assessee, a Limited Company, who had deducted tax at source (TDS) at a rate of 10% while making payments to a non-resident without a Permanent Account Number (PAN). The assessing officer contended that TDS should have been deducted at a higher rate of 20% as per Section 206AA. However, the Tribunal held that the assessee was not liable to deduct tax at a higher rate due to the provisions of Section 90(2) which related to Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs).

The High Court referred to a similar case before the Delhi High Court, where the issue was discussed extensively. The Delhi High Court observed that the law prior to the amendment of Section 206AA resulted in an additional 10% tax being levied if the non-resident payee did not possess a PAN, even if the DTAA mandated a lower rate of tax. The Court emphasized the primacy of DTAAs in determining the applicable tax rate for overseas residents operating in territories with agreements with India.

Given the detailed discussion in the Delhi High Court judgment and the Tribunal's decision, the High Court concurred with the interpretation of the relevant statutory provisions. The Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeals, affirming that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at a higher rate under Section 206AA due to the provisions of Section 90(2 and the DTAA in place.

---