TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>High Court allows business expenses for coffee/tea to customers as valid under Income-tax Act</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu I Versus Karuppuswamy Nadar And Sons</h3> Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu I Versus Karuppuswamy Nadar And Sons - [1979] 120 ITR 140, 2 TAXMANN 577 Issues involved: Interpretation of entertainment expenditure u/s 37(2B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Summary:The High Court of Madras addressed a reference from the Appellate Tribunal regarding the allowance of a sum of Rs. 12,495 u/s 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which was initially disallowed as entertainment expenditure u/s 37(2B). The firm, engaged in wholesale cloth business, incurred this expense on providing coffee, tea, etc., to customers. The Tribunal allowed the expenditure, considering it obligatory for business exigencies, leading to the court's review.In the relevant assessment year 1971-72, the provision of u/s 37(2B) restricted allowance for entertainment expenditure incurred after February 28, 1970. The court noted conflicting interpretations among different High Courts regarding what constitutes entertainment expenditure. The Gujarat High Court emphasized the concept of hospitality and necessity in business dealings, while the Kerala, Allahabad, and Punjab High Courts viewed expenses on customer amenities as entertainment expenditure.The court deliberated on the nature of the expenditure, highlighting that customary business courtesies extended to clients do not fall under entertainment expenditure. It differentiated lavish entertainment from basic hospitality provided to visiting clients, such as offering coffee or tea. Considering the business context and necessity of customer amenities, the court aligned with the Gujarat and Bombay High Courts' interpretations, ruling in favor of the assessee and allowing the claimed amount of Rs. 12,495.In conclusion, the court affirmed the Tribunal's decision, stating that providing coffee or tea to customers does not qualify as entertainment expenditure. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the distinction between entertainment and routine business courtesies. The court awarded costs to the assessee and upheld the Tribunal's decision to allow the claimed amount.
TaxTMI 