1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Court Orders Release of Goods Detained for E-Way Bill Violation</h1> The court ordered the release of goods and vehicle detained for failure to upload Part-B e-way bill under the CGST Act. The petitioner, a goods ... Detention of goods with vehicle - detention on the ground that the petitioner did not upload the Part-B e-way bill - Held that:- The respondent authority is directed to release the petitioner's goods and vehicle on the petitioner's βfurnishing Bank Guarantee for tax and penalty found due and a bond for the value of goods in the form as prescribed under Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rules - petition disposed off. Issues:Detention of goods for not uploading Part-B e-way bill under CGST Act.Analysis:The petitioner, a goods transporting agency and an assessee under the CGST Act, had their vehicle and goods detained by the Assistant State Tax Officer due to the failure to upload the Part-B e-way bill. The petitioner sought reliefs in the writ petition, including quashing the order of detention, refraining from further proceedings under section 129 of the Act, and releasing the goods without collecting any security under Section 129(1)(c).The judgment referred to a previous case, Renji Lal Damodaran Vs. State Tax Officer, where an identical issue was addressed by the Division Bench. Following the ratio of that judgment, the court directed the respondent authority to release the petitioner's goods and vehicle upon the petitioner furnishing a Bank Guarantee for tax and penalty due, along with a bond for the value of goods as prescribed under Rule 140(1) of the CGST Rules.Therefore, the court disposed of the writ petition by ordering the release of the goods and vehicle subject to the conditions of providing the necessary guarantees and bonds as specified under the CGST Rules.