Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (12) TMI 836 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court Decisions on Revenue & Deductions: Bad Debts, Leave Encashment, Expenditure, Right Issue The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the disallowance of bad debts written off under Section 36(1)(vii) and provision for leave encashment ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court Decisions on Revenue & Deductions: Bad Debts, Leave Encashment, Expenditure, Right Issue

                          The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the disallowance of bad debts written off under Section 36(1)(vii) and provision for leave encashment under Section 43B(f). However, the Court favored the assessee in the disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A and deduction under Section 35D. The issue of disallowance of bad debts of non-rural Banks written off under Section 36(1)(vii) was decided in favor of the assessee, with a requirement for further examination by the Assessing Officer. The Court sided with the Revenue on the disallowance of expenses relating to a right issue.




                          Issues Involved:

                          1. Disallowance of bad debts written off under Section 36(1)(vii).
                          2. Disallowance of expenditure incurred under Section 14A.
                          3. Levy of interest under Section 234B.
                          4. Disallowance of provision for leave encashment under Section 43B(f).
                          5. Disallowance of bad debts of non-rural Banks written off under Section 36(1)(vii).
                          6. Deduction under Section 35D of the Act.
                          7. Disallowance of expenses relating to right issue.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Disallowance of Bad Debts Written Off under Section 36(1)(vii):
                          The specific contention of the assessee was that having debited the sums in the separate assessment years, in the P&L account and netted the same from the total advances outstanding in the balance sheet, there is a complete write-off and there is no warrant to look into whether there has been a credit made to the specific account. The assessee relied on the Gujarat High Court decision in Vithaldas H. Dhanjibhai Bardanwala v. C.I.T. However, this Court, in I.T.A.No.264 of 2009 [South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT], found the issue against the assessee and in favor of the Revenue, noting the Supreme Court decision in Southern Technologies Ltd. v. Joint CIT. Thus, the question for all these years has been answered in favor of the Revenue.

                          2. Disallowance of Expenditure Incurred under Section 14A:
                          For the years 2001-02, 2005-06, and 2006-07, the issue of disallowance of expenditure under Section 14A was raised. The Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Essar Teleholdings Ltd. held that Section 14A would be applicable only from the year 2007-08. Therefore, for the present appeals arising from the prior years, the disallowance made by the AO under Section 14A, as affirmed by the Tribunal, has to be set aside. The question is answered in favor of the assessee.

                          3. Levy of Interest under Section 234B:
                          For the year 2006-07, the issue of levy of interest under Section 234B was raised. This question has already been answered in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee in South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT. Hence, the question stands answered against the assessee.

                          4. Disallowance of Provision for Leave Encashment under Section 43B(f):
                          For the year 2006-07, another issue was the disallowance of provision for leave encashment under Section 43B(f). Section 43B allows certain deductions only on actual payment. Sub-clause (f) pertains to any sum payable by the employer in lieu of any leave at the credit of his employee. The deduction is allowable only on actual payment. The Calcutta High Court had struck down the said provision, but a Special Leave Petition was filed before the Supreme Court, and a stay order was granted. Therefore, the provision applies, and this Court has also answered the question in favor of the Revenue in South Indian Bank Ltd. v. CIT. The question is answered against the assessee.

                          5. Disallowance of Bad Debts of Non-Rural Banks Written Off under Section 36(1)(vii):
                          For the years 2005-06 and 2006-07, the issue of disallowance of bad debts of non-rural Banks written off under Section 36(1)(vii) was raised. The AO declined the same, and the Tribunal relied on a Full Bench decision of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. The South Indian Bank Ltd. However, the Supreme Court reversed this decision in Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax. The Supreme Court found that the write-off of non-rural bad debts under sub-clause (vii) is independent of the provision for rural bad debts under sub-clause (viia). Therefore, the question is answered in favor of the assessee, with the reservation that the AO must examine whether any provision for non-rural bad debts has been granted deduction in the previous assessment year.

                          6. Deduction under Section 35D of the Act:
                          The issue was whether the Tribunal was correct in declining amortization of expenses incurred in connection with the issue of public subscription of shares under Section 35D, for the reason that the assessee was not an "industrial undertaking." The Finance Act, 2008, amended Section 35D to substitute "industrial undertaking" with "undertaking," effective from 01.04.2009. The learned Counsel for the appellant argued that this amendment should be deemed retrospective. However, the Notes on Clauses and the Memorandum Explaining the Provisions in the Finance Bill, 2008, indicated that the amendment would apply from the assessment year 2009-10 onwards. The Court considered various High Court decisions and found that the term "industrial undertaking" should be understood in a wide sense. Thus, the question was answered in favor of the assessee, finding the appellant-assessee eligible for the claim under Section 35D, with the actual expenditure to be considered by the AO.

                          7. Disallowance of Expenses Relating to Right Issue:
                          For the assessment year 2002-03, the issue was whether the Tribunal was correct in dismissing the issue relating to the disallowance of expenses relating to the right issue in view of the Supreme Court decision in Brooke Bond India Ltd. vs. CIT. The Court answered this question in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee.

                          Conclusion:
                          In light of the findings, I.T.A.Nos.456/2009, 643/2009, 498/2009, 635/2009, 712/2009, 98/2012, and 148/2012 are allowed, and I.T.A.Nos.1108/2009, 651/2009, 1691/2009, 717/2009, 1318/2009, 126/2012, and 116/2012 are partly allowed, with parties left to suffer their respective costs.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found