TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns addition for unexplained cash deposits, citing adequate evidence and lack of basis.</h1> <h3>Shalinder Singh Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kurukshetra</h3> Shalinder Singh Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, Kurukshetra - TMI Issues:- Addition made on account of unexplained cash deposits in the bank.Analysis:The appeal was filed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) regarding the addition made on account of cash found deposited in the bank of the assessee. The Assessing Officer noted that a significant amount of cash was deposited in the bank account of the assessee, which remained unexplained despite various opportunities provided. Consequently, the entire cash amount was added to the income of the assessee.Before the Ld. CIT(Appeals), the assessee submitted detailed explanations regarding the source of the cash deposits, attributing them to agricultural income, sale of trees, and salary received in cash. However, the Ld. CIT(Appeals) held that the assessee failed to establish the source of the cash deposits with proper evidence. The Ld. CIT(Appeals) specifically listed the dates and amounts of the cash deposits, totaling to Rs. 6,31,900, and noted the lack of cash flow details or withdrawal information provided by the assessee.In the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, the assessee reiterated that the cash deposits were from salary earnings and agricultural income. The assessee provided certificates from the college where they worked, evidence of land ownership, leasing agreements, and cash flow statements. The Tribunal observed that the Ld. CIT(Appeals) upheld the addition without sufficient basis, disregarding the evidence provided by the assessee. The Tribunal found that the assessee had adequately explained the source of the cash deposits with substantiated evidence, including salary certificates and land ownership documents. The Tribunal concluded that the addition on account of unexplained cash deposits was not sustainable and directed for its deletion.In the final judgment, the Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the deletion of the addition made on account of unexplained cash deposits. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee had provided satisfactory evidence to support the source of the cash deposits, which remained uncontroverted by the Revenue.
TaxTMI 