Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proviso to section 4(1)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 refers to the assessment year under the Gift-tax Act, 1958 or the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for determining whether transferred assets are excluded from the net wealth of the transferor.
Analysis: The proviso was inserted to avoid double taxation from the assessment year 1964-65 and its language indicates that the relevant assessment year is the one under the Gift-tax Act, 1958. The words used in the proviso show that exclusion from net wealth is available only where the transfer is chargeable to gift-tax, or not chargeable under section 5 of that Act, for assessment years commencing after 31 March 1964. The Court held that the condition relating to the assessment year and the condition relating to chargeability under the Gift-tax Act are cumulative. The punctuation mark relied on by the assessee was held to have no controlling effect.
Conclusion: The proviso refers to the assessment year under the Gift-tax Act, 1958, not the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and the Tribunal's view was /affirmed; the question was answered against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: A proviso excluding transferred assets from net wealth must be construed according to its context and object, and where the language links chargeability to gift-tax with assessment years commencing after a specified date, the reference is to the Gift-tax Act assessment year rather than the Wealth-tax Act assessment year.