Non-exclusive trade-mark licence is not a taxable transfer of the right to use goods under U.P. trade tax law.

A non-exclusive permission to use a trade-mark did not amount to a transfer of the right to use goods under Section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948. The controlling test required a transfer conferring an exclusive legal right for the relevant period, together with exclusion of the transferor from simultaneous use or further transfer. Because the assessee allowed use of the mark by more than one entity and retained the ability to use or transfer the same right, the arrangement remained a licence rather than a taxable transfer. The Allahabad HC therefore held the transaction not taxable under Section 3F and rejected the revisions.

---

---

Issues: Whether transfer of a non-exclusive right to use trade-mark amounted to a taxable transfer of right to use goods under Section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948.

Analysis: The taxability turned on whether the arrangement satisfied the settled tests for a transfer of the right to use goods. The controlling principle required not merely permission to use the goods, but a transfer conferring an exclusive legal right for the relevant period, with the transferor being disabled from simultaneously using or further transferring the same right. On the facts, the assessee had permitted use of the trade-mark to more than one entity and had not excluded itself from further use or transfer. The arrangement therefore retained the character of a licence rather than a transfer of the right to use goods. The absence of a material factual distinction from the earlier decision in the assessee's own case reinforced the same conclusion.

Conclusion: The transaction was not taxable under Section 3F of the U.P. Trade Tax Act, 1948, and the revisions failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A non-exclusive permission to use a trade-mark, where the transferor retains the ability to use or further transfer the same right, is a licence and not a taxable transfer of the right to use goods.

---