Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether there was any mistake apparent on record warranting rectification of the Tribunal's earlier classification of electrical grade insulating pressboard under Chapter Heading 4810.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the earlier classification had been made by relying on the Commissioner's order classifying the product under Chapter Heading 4810, and that the Revenue had accepted that order. In these circumstances, the classification could not be treated as a mistake apparent from the record, and any grievance against the classification required a substantive challenge rather than rectification.
Conclusion: No mistake apparent on record was established, and the rectification application was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The Tribunal declined to disturb the earlier classification and left the original order undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Rectification lies only for an evident mistake apparent on the face of the record and cannot be used to reopen a classification decision that was based on an accepted order.