TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal decision on deducting gift & business expenses under Income Tax Act</h1> <h3>Ashraay Enterprises Versus ACIT-31 (1), Mumbai.</h3> Ashraay Enterprises Versus ACIT-31 (1), Mumbai. - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of gift expenses under section 37 of the Income Tax Act.2. Disallowance of various business expenses due to lack of verifiable evidence.Analysis:*Issue 1: Disallowance of gift expenses under section 37 of the Income Tax Act*In this case, the assessee appealed against the addition of Rs. 35,000 as a gift expense, claiming it was a business expense under section 37 of the Act. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the amount, considering it a personal expense. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) also upheld the disallowance, stating that the gift was not part of the salary and did not constitute a business expense. The Appellate Tribunal concurred, citing that the gift was a personal expense, not directly related to the income-generating apparatus of the assessee. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, emphasizing that personal gifts cannot be claimed as legitimate business expenditure for tax purposes.*Issue 2: Disallowance of various business expenses due to lack of verifiable evidence*The AO disallowed a portion of various business expenses totaling Rs. 18,31,221, including traveling, telephone, vehicle, and miscellaneous expenses, due to lack of verifiable evidence. The AO made an ad hoc disallowance of 15% of the expenses, amounting to Rs. 2,74,683. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, noting discrepancies in the ledger accounts and lack of proper evidence for the expenses. The Appellate Tribunal acknowledged the business nature of the expenses but found the disallowance excessive. The Tribunal directed the AO to restrict the disallowance to 10% of the total expenses, considering the facts and circumstances of the case. Consequently, the appeal was partly allowed, reducing the disallowance percentage.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the disallowance of gift expenses as personal rather than business expenditures. However, it partially allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of various business expenses, reducing the percentage of disallowance based on the circumstances of the case.
TaxTMI 