Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment was void ab initio for want of a valid notice under section 143(2) issued by the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, and whether the assessment framed by the officer who completed the assessment could be sustained.
Analysis: The additional legal ground was admitted as it was purely jurisdictional and went to the root of the matter. The return had been filed with the Faridabad address, while the scrutiny notice under section 143(2) was issued by the officer at Hazaribagh. The case was later transferred to Faridabad under section 127, but no valid notice under section 143(2) had been issued by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction when the scrutiny proceedings were initiated. The assessment therefore lacked the necessary jurisdictional foundation. Following the cited precedents, the defect in the notice was treated as fatal to the assessment.
Conclusion: The assessment was held to be void ab initio and was quashed. The additional ground was allowed and the remaining grounds were rendered academic.