Tribunal Admits Petition, Declares Moratorium under Section 7 of IBC

The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of IBC, declaring a moratorium and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional. The order was communicated to the Financial Creditor, Corporate Debtor, and Interim Resolution Professional, initiating the corporate insolvency resolution process.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Default in repayment under the Rupee Term Loan Agreements (RTL).
2. Joint and several liability of the Corporate Debtor with other Videocon group companies.
3. Merger of various State Banks into State Bank of India (SBI).
4. Classification of the debt as "Financial Debt" under IBC.
5. Prior admission of CIRP against Videocon Industries Limited (VIL).
6. Applicability of Section 14(c) of IBC.
7. Maintainability of the Petition under IBC versus Civil law jurisdiction.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Default in Repayment under the Rupee Term Loan Agreements (RTL):
The petition was filed by State Bank of India (SBI) against the Corporate Debtor for defaulting on payments amounting to Rs. 456.90 crores as of 31st December 2017 under the Rupee Term Loan Agreements (RTL). The loans were initially granted by various state banks which later merged into SBI.

2. Joint and Several Liability of the Corporate Debtor with Other Videocon Group Companies:
The Corporate Debtor was jointly and severally liable as an Obligor/Co-obligor with 12 other Videocon group companies to repay the loan. The RTL agreement specified that each obligor, including the Corporate Debtor, was liable for the obligations and liabilities of all other obligors.

3. Merger of Various State Banks into State Bank of India (SBI):
The loans were originally disbursed by State Bank of Hyderabad, State Bank of Mysore, State Bank of Travancore, State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur, and State Bank of Punjab. These banks merged into SBI effective 1st April 2017, and thus the loans are now considered to have been granted by SBI.

4. Classification of the Debt as "Financial Debt" under IBC:
The Corporate Debtor argued that the RTL was disbursed only to VIL, not to the other Obligor/Co-obligor companies, and thus did not qualify as "Financial Debt" under IBC. However, the Tribunal found that the Corporate Debtor was part of the RTL agreement and had assumed the primary obligation to repay the debt, thus falling within the definition of "debt" under IBC.

5. Prior Admission of CIRP against Videocon Industries Limited (VIL):
The Corporate Debtor contended that a CIRP had already been initiated against VIL for the same debt, and thus a separate CIRP against the Corporate Debtor was not maintainable. The Tribunal noted that the liability of the obligors was joint and several, and the initiation of CIRP against VIL did not preclude similar action against the Corporate Debtor.

6. Applicability of Section 14(c) of IBC:
The Corporate Debtor argued that Section 14(c) of IBC, which prohibits initiation of separate CIRP for the same secured assets, should apply. The Tribunal, however, found that the RTL agreement imposed joint and several liability on all obligors, allowing separate petitions against each for the same debt.

7. Maintainability of the Petition under IBC versus Civil Law Jurisdiction:
The Corporate Debtor argued that the remedy lay in Civil law and not under IBC as there was no direct disbursement to the Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal rejected this argument, stating that the RTL agreement and the obligations therein fell squarely within the definition of "debt" under IBC, making the petition maintainable.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal found sufficient evidence of debt and default, and thus admitted the petition under Section 7 of IBC. The Tribunal declared a moratorium prohibiting the institution or continuation of suits, transferring or disposing of assets, and other actions against the Corporate Debtor. An Interim Resolution Professional was appointed to carry out the functions as per IBC, and a public announcement of the corporate insolvency resolution process was mandated.

Order:
The petition was admitted, and the Registry was directed to communicate the order to the Financial Creditor, the Corporate Debtor, and the Interim Resolution Professional.

---