Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (11) TMI 1254 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Undisclosed income: profit-rate assessment permitted; penalty under Section 158BFA limited to excess over return under Section 158BC. Undisclosed income revealed on search may be determined by reference to an appropriate profit rate of receipts rather than by treating full recovered ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Undisclosed income: profit-rate assessment permitted; penalty under Section 158BFA limited to excess over return under Section 158BC.

                          Undisclosed income revealed on search may be determined by reference to an appropriate profit rate of receipts rather than by treating full recovered receipts as income; applying that principle the Tribunal's adoption of 15% of receipts as undisclosed income is upheld in favour of the assessee. Penalty under Section 158BFA is a civil liability contingent on returns filed under the special search-return regime, and may be imposed only on the portion of undisclosed income finally determined to exceed the income shown in the return; penalty issue is remanded for recomputation and imposition only on the excess.




                          Issues: (i) Whether undisclosed income revealed on search can be assessed by treating the entire receipts as income or by adopting a profit percentage of receipts; (ii) Whether penalty under Section 158BFA is a quasi criminal proceeding requiring mens rea or a civil liability and, if civil, whether penalty can be imposed where return under Section 158BC has been filed.

                          Issue (i): Whether the Tribunal was correct in directing levy of income tax only on 15% of the total receipts disclosed in proceedings under Section 158BC of the Income tax Act, 1961, instead of treating the entire recovered receipts as undisclosed income.

                          Analysis: Section 158B(2) defines ''undisclosed income'' as including income based on entries or transactions not disclosed; it does not deem entire recovered receipts to be the undisclosed income. Where sale consideration recovered on search was not reflected in books or returns, the undisclosed income must be determined; the Tribunal examined net profit statements and adopted 15% as representative profit. Provisions of Chapter XIVB and the applicability of assessment provisions (including Section 158BC and related provisions) permit determination of undisclosed income by reference to appropriate profit rates rather than treating full receipts as income.

                          Conclusion: In favour of Assessee. The Tribunal correctly directed adoption of 15% of the undisclosed receipts as undisclosed income and the Revenue's appeal on assessment is rejected.

                          Issue (ii): Whether penalty under Section 158BFA is a quasi criminal proceeding requiring proof of mens rea, or a civil liability, and the scope of imposition where returns under Section 158BC have been filed.

                          Analysis: The provisos to Section 158BFA(2) show that penalty is contingent on determination in excess of returns filed under Section 158BC; statutory obligation to file returns and pay tax is a civil liability. Precedents distinguishing Hindustan Steel where mens rea was required are applicable where the statutory duty is civil. Penalty cannot be imposed where the assessee has filed the return under Section 158BC and paid tax on the returnable income unless the final determined undisclosed income exceeds the income shown in that return; penalty is limited to the excess portion.

                          Conclusion: In favour of Revenue to the limited extent that penalty is a civil liability and may be imposed only on the portion of undisclosed income determined in excess of the income shown in the return filed under Section 158BC; otherwise in favour of Assessee. The Tribunal's order setting aside penalty is to be modified by remand for recomputation and imposition of penalty only on the excess as directed.

                          Final Conclusion: The assessment appeal is rejected insofar as the Tribunal's adoption of 15% of receipts as undisclosed income is upheld; the penalty appeal is allowed only to the extent of permitting recomputation and imposition of penalty on amounts determined in excess of returns filed under Section 158BC, with remand for computation.

                          Ratio Decidendi: Undisclosed income revealed on search is to be determined on its merits and may be assessed by adopting an appropriate profit rate of receipts rather than treating entire recovered receipts as income; penalty under Section 158BFA is a civil liability and is leviable only on the portion of undisclosed income determined to be in excess of the income shown in a return filed under Section 158BC of the Income tax Act, 1961.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found