Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer had information in his possession within the meaning of Section 147(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 so as to justify reopening and reassessment for assessment year 1965-66.
Analysis: The reassessment was founded on two materials obtained during assessment proceedings for a later year: the report of the Board of Experts showing a lower actual cost of centering machines than that claimed in the books, and the partner's written admission accepting computation on that basis. These materials had concrete existence, came from an external source, and bore directly on the assessee's true income. Information under Section 147(b) includes factual material obtained from outside the assessee's own record, and the existence of such material enabled the Income-tax Officer to form a reasonable belief that income had escaped assessment. The contention that this was merely a change of opinion was rejected because the reopening was based on fresh material and not on a mere review of the earlier assessment.
Conclusion: The reassessment was validly initiated under Section 147(b), and the question referred was answered in the affirmative.
Ratio Decidendi: Factual material obtained from an external source, including a relevant admission and expert report bearing on the assessment, constitutes information for Section 147(b) and can validly found a reasonable belief that income has escaped assessment.