Benami partnership and income clubbing fail where a minor's share arises from an independent gift, not a transfer by the father.

A minor admitted only to the benefits of a partnership was not treated as a benamidar of his father where the capital originated from a gift by the maternal grandfather and the father was neither the source of the transfer nor connected with it. On those facts, the arrangement did not establish that the father remained the real partner in benami form. The minor's share income also could not be clubbed with the father's income because clubbing requires a legally relevant nexus between the assessee and the asset or transfer generating the income, and no such transfer by the father was shown. The reference was answered in favour of the assessee.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the minor, Jagmohandas, was only a benamidar of his father, Manaklal, in the newly constituted firm. (ii) Whether the share income of the minor from the firm could be clubbed with the income of his father, who was not a partner in that firm.

Issue (i): The amount invested in the new firm came from a gift made by the maternal grandfather out of his own share in the dissolved firm. Manaklal was not the source of the gift and had no concern with the transfer. The minor was admitted only to the benefits of the partnership and the surrounding circumstances did not justify treating the arrangement as one in which Manaklal continued as the real partner in benami form.

Conclusion: The minor was not a benamidar of Manaklal.

Issue (ii): Clubbing of the minor's share income required a legally relevant connection between the assessee and the asset or transfer from which the income arose. Since the gift was not made by the father and the income did not arise from any transfer by him, the profits earned by the minor in the firm could not be treated as the assessee's income.

Conclusion: The minor's share income could not be clubbed with the income of Manaklal.

Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and the Tribunal's view on benami ownership and clubbing of the minor's income was rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: Income earned by a minor admitted to the benefits of a partnership cannot be clubbed with the father's income unless the income is traceable to a transfer or asset provided by the father or to a legally sustainable benami arrangement established on the facts.

---