Partial success for assessee in tax appeals for multiple years, with adjustments in transfer pricing and interest charges.

The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals for A.Y. 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11, with adjustments made in transfer pricing on exports and interest charged to associated enterprises. Deductions under Section 10B were upheld, disallowances of foreign exchange gain and scrap sales were overturned, and royalty expenditure was allowed. Disallowances under Sections 14A, FCCB issue expenses, and amortization of premium on FCCB redemption were rejected. The Revenue's appeal on interest receivable and charging interest on share application money were dismissed.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Computation of taxable income.
2. Transfer pricing adjustments on exports to associated enterprises.
3. Transfer pricing adjustments on interest charged to associated enterprises.
4. Deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act.
5. Disallowance of foreign exchange gain under Section 10B.
6. Disallowance of scrap sales under Section 10B.
7. Disallowance of royalty expenditure as capital expenditure.
8. Disallowance under Section 14A for expenses attributable to exempt income.
9. Disallowance of FCCB issue expenses.
10. Disallowance of amortization of premium on redemption of FCCB.
11. Revenue's appeal on the application of PLR for interest receivable from loans to subsidiaries.
12. Revenue's appeal on charging interest on share application money.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Computation of Taxable Income:
The assessing officer computed the taxable income of the appellant at Rs. 62,39,09,420 against a returned loss of Rs. 79,08,80,137 for A.Y. 2008-09. For A.Y. 2009-10, the taxable income was computed at Rs. 54,71,49,400 against a returned loss of Rs. 1,93,73,70,310. For A.Y. 2010-11, the taxable income was computed at Rs. 1,43,95,15,290 against a returned loss of Rs. 6,63,65,973.

2. Transfer Pricing Adjustments on Exports to Associated Enterprises:
The assessing officer made an addition of Rs. 73,99,46,465 for A.Y. 2008-09, Rs. 1,78,26,66,433 for A.Y. 2009-10, and Rs. 41,53,41,460 for A.Y. 2010-11 on account of the alleged difference in arm's length price of exports to associated enterprises. The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the TPO for verification, directing the TPO to consider the foreign AE as the tested party if the assessee provides complete financials of the foreign AE and relevant comparables.

3. Transfer Pricing Adjustments on Interest Charged to Associated Enterprises:
The assessing officer made an addition of Rs. 98,88,047 for A.Y. 2008-09, Rs. 9,12,25,805 for A.Y. 2009-10, and Rs. 5,20,26,523 for A.Y. 2010-11 on account of the alleged difference in arm's length price of interest charged by the appellant from its associated enterprises. The Tribunal held that the interest rate should be based on the currency in which the loan is to be repaid, and allowed the assessee's contention of using EURIBOR + 200 basis points.

4. Deduction under Section 10B of the Income Tax Act:
The assessing officer reduced the deduction claimed under Section 10B to NIL by setting off the losses of other units. The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim, following the Supreme Court decision in CIT vs Yokogawa India Ltd., which held that the deduction under Section 10B should be computed before setting off losses of other units.

5. Disallowance of Foreign Exchange Gain under Section 10B:
The assessing officer disallowed the deduction under Section 10B in respect of foreign exchange gain, holding it to be income not derived from the industrial undertaking. The Tribunal allowed the deduction, following its own decision in the assessee's case for previous years, where it was held that foreign exchange gain arising out of business of eligible undertaking is eligible for deduction under Section 10B.

6. Disallowance of Scrap Sales under Section 10B:
The assessing officer disallowed the deduction under Section 10B in respect of scrap sales, holding it to be income not derived from the industrial undertaking. The Tribunal allowed the deduction, following the decision of the Karnataka High Court in GE BE (P) Ltd. vs ACIT, which held that scrap sales arising out of the business of eligible undertaking are eligible for deduction under Section 10B.

7. Disallowance of Royalty Expenditure as Capital Expenditure:
The assessing officer disallowed 25% of the expenditure on royalty as capital expenditure. The Tribunal allowed the deduction, following its own decision in the assessee's case for previous years, where it was held that the payment for royalty/technical know-how was revenue in nature and deductible.

8. Disallowance under Section 14A for Expenses Attributable to Exempt Income:
The assessing officer disallowed a sum invoking provisions of Section 14A read with Rule 8D, holding it to be expenses attributable towards investments made for earning exempt dividend income. The Tribunal remanded the issue back to the assessing officer for re-computation, directing the officer to record satisfaction regarding the nexus of exempt income with expenses incurred.

9. Disallowance of FCCB Issue Expenses:
The assessing officer disallowed the deduction of expenses incurred on the issue of FCCB, holding it to be capital in nature. The Tribunal allowed the deduction, following the decision of the Delhi High Court in CIT vs Havells India Limited, which held that expenditure incurred on the issue of debentures is to be allowed as revenue expenditure.

10. Disallowance of Amortization of Premium on Redemption of FCCB:
The assessing officer disallowed the deduction of amortized premium on redemption of FCCB, holding it to be unascertained and contingent in nature. The Tribunal allowed the deduction, following the decision of the Supreme Court in Taparia Tools Limited vs JCIT, which held that premium on redemption of FCCB can be amortized over the life of FCCB and claimed as deduction.

11. Revenue's Appeal on the Application of PLR for Interest Receivable from Loans to Subsidiaries:
The Revenue appealed against the DRP's direction to apply PLR of RBI for determining ALP of interest receivable from loans to subsidiaries. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, following its decision on the assessee's appeal regarding the use of EURIBOR + 200 basis points for benchmarking the interest rate.

12. Revenue's Appeal on Charging Interest on Share Application Money:
The Revenue appealed against the DRP's direction that no interest need to be charged on share application money pending with foreign subsidiaries. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, following the decision of the Delhi Tribunal in Bharti Airtel Ltd. vs Additional CIT, which held that such transactions do not fall within the purview of 'international transaction' under Section 92B.

Conclusion:
The assessee's appeals for A.Y. 2008-09, 2009-10, and 2010-11 were partly allowed for statistical purposes, and the Revenue's appeal for A.Y. 2009-10 was dismissed.

---