Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether credit on cement and structural items used in relation to plant and machinery was admissible, and whether the entitlement had to be determined on the basis of the actual use of the goods.
Analysis: The relevant regime was Rule 57A and Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. Credit on construction material is not admissible when it is used merely for buildings, but it may be admissible when the material is used for support structure, foundation, or other use directly connected with machinery or capital goods. The deciding factor is the actual user of the goods. The record showed that the show cause notice proceeded on the basis that the goods were used for construction, while the assessee claimed use in relation to machinery and foundations. The proper course, therefore, was to examine the exact use of the goods and apply the user test.
Conclusion: The question of admissibility of credit was not finally decided on merits and was remanded to the original adjudicating authority for fresh examination of the actual use of the goods.
Ratio Decidendi: Eligibility for credit on cement and structural items depends on their actual use and the functional nexus with machinery or capital goods, not merely on their description as construction material.