TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Petitioner challenges GST penalty order, seeks release of goods pending response.</h1> <h3>M/s Krishna Enterprises Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others</h3> The petitioner challenged an order under Section 129(3) of the U.P. GST Act, seeking penalty under Section 129(1)(a) instead of (b). Respondents were ... Release of seized goods alongwith vehicle - Section 129(3) of the U.P. GST - Held thar:- The seized goods and the vehicle shall be released on the petitioner depositing the amount in accordance with the provision of Section 129(1)(a) of the Act and on giving an indemnity bond of the same amount. The petitioner challenged an order under Section 129(3) of the U.P. GST Act regarding tax and penalty for releasing goods. Petitioner argued for penalty under Section 129(1)(a) instead of (b). Respondents given three weeks to respond. Goods and vehicle to be released upon depositing amount under Section 129(1)(a) and providing indemnity bond. Case listed for admission/final disposal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
