Jurisdictional limits on taxability adjudication upheld, with remand to the proper officer and merits left open.

A Superintendent lacked jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute involving taxability because the governing circular restricted that officer's authority in matters of taxability, classification and valuation. The original order was therefore treated as beyond jurisdiction on the taxability issue. The Commissioner (Appeals) correctly confined the matter to that jurisdictional defect and remanded it for reconsideration by the proper officer. Arguments on the merits were premature at that stage, since the matter had not yet been validly adjudicated by the competent authority.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Superintendent had jurisdiction to adjudicate a dispute involving taxability and whether the Commissioner (Appeals) was justified in setting aside the original order and remanding the matter for re-adjudication.

Analysis: The adjudicating authority was a Superintendent, and the governing circular limited the Superintendent's jurisdiction in matters involving taxability, classification and valuation. In view of that restriction, the original order was rightly treated as beyond jurisdiction in so far as it decided the taxability issue. Since the Commissioner (Appeals) had confined the disposal to the jurisdictional defect and had remanded the matter for consideration by the proper officer, the assessee's arguments on the merits were held to be premature at that stage.

Conclusion: The Commissioner (Appeals) was in setting aside the original order and remanding the matter, and the challenge to the remand failed.

---