Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported deck barge, fitted with cranes and used as a pontoon, was classifiable under Heading 8901 as a barge or under Heading 8905 as a vessel whose navigability was subsidiary to its main function, and whether exemption under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus was available.
Analysis: The vessel was found to be a pontoon with limited carrying capacity, fitted with cranes and a diesel generator, and not navigable on its own but towable. The descriptive and technical material showed that its deck structures and cranes were integral to its design, bringing it within the scope of pontoons fitted with lifting or handling machines. The explanatory notes to Heading 8905 specifically include pontoons fitted with cranes and pontoons designed as bases for such machines. Since the vessel fell under Heading 8905, the exemption linked to Heading 8901 was not applicable.
Conclusion: The vessel was correctly classified under Heading 8905.9090 and not under Heading 8901.1040, and the exemption claim failed.