Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the denial of CENVAT credit on iron and steel materials and cement supplied free of cost for construction of clinker silos, and the consequential penalty, required reconsideration in light of the applicable precedent.
Analysis: The dispute concerned credit taken on materials used in the civil construction connected with clinker silos. The matter was covered by earlier decisions relied on by the appellant, and the Tribunal followed the same course adopted in those cases. In view of the precedent, the appropriate course was to remit the matter to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision on the basis of the evidence and pleadings. Since the issue required fresh adjudication, the penalty could not be sustained at this stage.
Conclusion: The matter was remanded for de novo consideration and the penalties were set aside.