TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appellate Tribunal clarifies Section 54F: Net sale consideration basis for investment in new property</h1> <h3>Smt. Nilanjana Chakraborti Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-22, Kolkata</h3> Smt. Nilanjana Chakraborti Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-22, Kolkata - TMI Issues:1. Denial of exemption u/s 54F of the Income Tax Act by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).2. Interpretation of Section 50C in relation to Section 54F of the Act.Issue 1: Denial of Exemption u/s 54F:The appeal challenged the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) denying the exemption claimed under Section 54F of the Income Tax Act for Assessment Year 2013-14. The appellant disputed the erroneous determination of long term capital gain and the denial of benefits under Section 54F. The Assessing Officer contended that the appellant was the owner of more than one residential house at the date of transfer of the long term capital asset, which did not comply with the conditions of Section 54F. The appellant claimed to have invested in two residential flats and spent on house construction, seeking exemption under Section 54F. The First Appellate Authority upheld the denial of exemption.Issue 2: Interpretation of Section 50C in relation to Section 54F:The debate centered on whether the deeming provisions of Section 50C of the Act could be applied to Section 54F. The appellant argued that the net sale consideration should be the basis for investment in a new residential house property, not the full value of consideration as defined under Section 50C. Citing the decision in DCIT vs. Dr. Chalasani Mallikarjuna Rao, the appellant contended that the full value of consideration under Section 50C should not govern the meaning of full value of consideration in Section 54F. The Tribunal held that the net sale consideration should be considered for exemption under Section 54F, even if the full value of consideration was higher. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the capital gains and examine the appellant's claim of investing in a second house property for exemption under Section 54F.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal in Kolkata allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to grant exemption under Section 54F for the investment made in a second residential house property. The Tribunal clarified that the deeming provisions of Section 50C should not affect the application of Section 54F, emphasizing that the net sale consideration should determine eligibility for exemption. The decision was based on the interpretation of relevant legal provisions and precedents, ensuring the appellant's entitlement to tax benefits as per the Income Tax Act.
TaxTMI 