TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee's Appeal Partly Allowed: Undisclosed Income Confirmed, Gift Amount Excluded. Net Profit Rate Challenge Dismissed.</h1> <h3>Shri Devi Singh Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur</h3> Shri Devi Singh Versus Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 (2), Jaipur - TMI Issues Involved:1. Treatment of cash deposits as undisclosed income.2. Treatment of the opening balance of the capital account as undisclosed income.3. Estimation of net profit rate.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Treatment of Cash Deposits as Undisclosed Income:The assessee contested the addition of Rs. 10,33,563/- as undisclosed income, arguing that the cash deposits were part of the business transactions from liquor sales. The assessee highlighted that the turnover from the liquor business was Rs. 1,09,33,148/-, and cash deposits of Rs. 19,22,790/- were made, which constituted 17.59% of the total turnover. The assessee claimed that the deposits were used for purchasing liquor from government agencies and included money from the assessee's father, a farmer without a bank account.The appellate authority noted that the assessee did not initially disclose the bank account and failed to link the cash sales with the deposits through verifiable evidence. The cash book did not reflect these deposits, leading to the conclusion that the bank account was used to deposit unrecorded receipts. The appellate authority upheld the lower authorities' decision, emphasizing the assessee's failure to demonstrate the source of the cash deposits satisfactorily. The addition of Rs. 10,33,563/- as undisclosed income was confirmed.2. Treatment of the Opening Balance of the Capital Account as Undisclosed Income:The assessee claimed that the opening balance of Rs. 6,31,450/- was a gift from his father, supported by documents such as the Jamabandi Report, Khasra Girdawari Report, photographs of agricultural land, an affidavit from the father, and a certificate from the village Sarpanch. The lower authorities doubted the genuineness of the transaction due to the absence of a gift deed and bank statements.The appellate authority found the AO's decision to restrict the addition to Rs. 4,31,450/- arbitrary, as the transaction should be accepted or rejected in totality. The appellate authority accepted the assessee's contention of receiving initial finance from his father for starting a new business, supported by land records and earnings. The addition of Rs. 4,31,450/- was deleted, and the ground was allowed.3. Estimation of Net Profit Rate:The assessee contested the AO's estimation of net profit at 8% against the declared net profit rate of 2.30%, resulting in a trading addition of Rs. 6,23,202/-. However, this ground was not pressed during the hearing and was dismissed as not pressed.Conclusion:The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed, with the addition of Rs. 10,33,563/- as undisclosed income confirmed, the addition of Rs. 4,31,450/- deleted, and the ground regarding the net profit rate dismissed as not pressed. The judgment was pronounced in the open court on 01/10/2018.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
