E-procurement Transaction Fee as a Supply of Services: GST Implications Clarified The e-procurement Transaction Fee collected on behalf of the IT E&C department constitutes a supply of services. The applicant is entitled to service ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
E-procurement Transaction Fee as a Supply of Services: GST Implications Clarified
The e-procurement Transaction Fee collected on behalf of the IT E&C department constitutes a supply of services. The applicant is entitled to service charges for managing the funds, and this collection does not attract tax liability as it is for services rendered to the ITE&C Department. While the applicant collected GST at 18% for certain transactions, this was not legally permitted and could lead to forfeiture. The ruling clarified that no tax liability arises on the Transaction Fee collected for services rendered by the State Government, and the applicant must follow the procedure for remittance of GST collected and manage funds as per ITE&C Department guidelines.
Issues: 1. Whether e-procurement Transaction Fee collected on behalf of IT E&C department results in supply of goods or services or both within the meaning of Supply as defined by law. 2. Whether Tax liability arises on e-procurement Transaction Fee collected on behalf of ITE&C department.
Analysis: Issue 1: The applicant, engaged in supply of services, sought clarification on whether the e-procurement Transaction Fee collected for the IT E&C department constitutes a supply of goods or services. The applicant was directed to open separate accounts for this purpose and manage the funds as per the instructions of the ITE&C Department. The Authority observed that the applicant acts as a fund-manager and cannot utilize the funds independently without ITE&C Department's approval. As per G.O.Ms.No.17, the applicant is entitled to service charges for managing the funds, and this collection does not attract liability under the law, as it is for services rendered to ITE&C Department.
Issue 2: Regarding the Tax liability on the e-procurement Transaction Fee collected, the Authority noted that the applicant collected GST at 18% for certain transactions. However, this collection, not legally permitted, could lead to forfeiture under specific provisions. The Authority clarified that the issue of remittance of tax collected does not fall under its jurisdiction and directed the applicant to obtain the procedure for remittance from the relevant authorities. The liability does not arise on the Transaction Fee collected for services rendered by the State Government, as per the relevant notification.
The ruling by the Authority states that the e-procurement Transaction Fee collected on behalf of the ITE&C department qualifies as a 'Supply' under the SGST Act, 2017 and CGST Act, 2017. However, regarding Tax liability, it is clarified that no liability arises on the Transaction Fee collected for services rendered by the State Government, as per the specific notification. The applicant is directed to follow the procedure for remittance of GST collected and manage the funds as per the guidelines provided by the ITE&C Department.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.