Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the supply of food by the appellant to employees of a unit located in a Special Economic Zone is a zero-rated supply under the integrated goods and services tax law, and whether the activity can be treated as restaurant services attracting the concessional rate.
Analysis: Zero-rated supply covers supply of goods or services to a Special Economic Zone developer or a Special Economic Zone unit. The supply in question was made to employees of the unit, who are neither the developer nor the unit itself, so the transaction could not be treated as zero-rated merely because the employees worked in the SEZ. The appellant was engaged as an outdoor caterer, cooking food at one place and distributing it to different client locations. On that basis, the activity did not answer the description of restaurant services, since a restaurant is a place where meals are prepared and served to customers. The applicable classification and rate therefore followed the service classification under the notification governing rate of tax.
Conclusion: The supply to employees of the SEZ unit is not zero-rated, and the appellant's activity is not restaurant services. The ruling against the appellant was sustained.