Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2018 (11) TMI 179 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds Disallowance of Credit on Trading Activities The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the department's decision to disallow credit on trading activities. It concluded that Rule 3 of CENVAT Credit ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Upholds Disallowance of Credit on Trading Activities

                          The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the department's decision to disallow credit on trading activities. It concluded that Rule 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 was correctly invoked, and recovery under Rule 14 was deemed valid. The Tribunal distinguished a previous case regarding trading as an exempted service, emphasizing the inapplicability of Rule 6 in the present matter. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(4) was upheld, emphasizing the wrongful availing and utilization of credit.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Eligibility of CENVAT credit on common input services used for trading activities.
                          2. Invocation of Rule 3 vs. Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
                          3. Applicability of Rule 14 for recovery of wrongly availed credit.
                          4. Consideration of trading as an exempted service prior to 1.4.2011.
                          5. Validity of extended period for demand.
                          6. Imposition of penalty under Rule 15(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Eligibility of CENVAT Credit on Common Input Services Used for Trading Activities:
                          The appellants were engaged in providing both taxable services and trading activities. They availed input tax credit on common input services used for both activities. The department argued that credit on common input services used for trading activities is not eligible as per Rule 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The appellants, however, considered trading as an exempted service and reversed proportionate credit as per Rule 6(3)(ii) of CCR, 2004.

                          2. Invocation of Rule 3 vs. Rule 6 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:
                          The department invoked Rule 3 to disallow the credit, stating that trading is not a service, hence credit on input services used for trading is not permissible. The appellants argued that the department should have invoked Rule 6, which pertains to exempted services. The Tribunal noted that Rule 3 provides the conditions for availing credit and does not allow credit on trading activities. The Tribunal held that the show cause notice correctly invoked Rule 3 for disallowing credit.

                          3. Applicability of Rule 14 for Recovery of Wrongly Availed Credit:
                          The appellants contended that Rule 14, which deals with the recovery of wrongly availed credit, cannot be applied without invoking Rule 6. The Tribunal clarified that Rule 14 provides for the recovery of wrongly availed credit and does not specifically mention Rule 3 or Rule 6. The Tribunal upheld the department's action under Rule 14 for recovery of the credit.

                          4. Consideration of Trading as an Exempted Service Prior to 1.4.2011:
                          The appellants relied on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Madras in Ruchika Global Interlinks, which held that trading is to be considered an exempted service even prior to 1.4.2011. The Tribunal acknowledged this decision but distinguished it from the present case, noting that Ruchika Global dealt with the applicability of Rule 6, while the present case involved Rule 3. The Tribunal held that trading cannot be considered an exempted service under Rule 3.

                          5. Validity of Extended Period for Demand:
                          The appellants argued that the extended period is not invocable as the issue is interpretational and the department had knowledge of their activities. The Tribunal did not specifically address this argument but upheld the demand, indicating that the extended period was validly invoked.

                          6. Imposition of Penalty under Rule 15(4) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004:
                          The appellants argued that the penalty should be set aside as the issue was interpretational. The Tribunal, however, upheld the imposition of penalty under Rule 15(4), as the credit was wrongly availed and utilized.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, holding that the demand for disallowing the credit on trading activities is legal and proper. The show cause notice correctly invoked Rule 3 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, and the recovery under Rule 14 was upheld. The Tribunal found that the decision in Ruchika Global Interlinks did not assist the appellants, and the imposition of penalty was justified.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found